

These plans failed, in part because of the falling of high-voltage lines and the explosion of a substation in Crimea. Russian officials announced their plans to disconnect the NPP from Ukraine's power grid and connect it to the Russian one and the Crimea peninsula by September 1. But the Russian soldiers and engineers took control, killing some of the Ukrainian workers and exerting moral and physical pressure over those who still run the plant, including torture. So Russian engineers were unable to operate the station without Ukrainian personnel. Russians captured the station on March 4, firing on the facility dozens of times, using it as an army base mining two nuclear power units, and parking ammunition and military vehicles in its machinery rooms.ĭuring Ukraine’s independence period, the NPP was much upgraded, including with Western nuclear safety technologies. It contains stores of used nuclear fuel and radioactive materials and the only training center (operation simulators) in Ukraine. This makes the facility the biggest in Europe. Zaporizhzhia NPP contains six reactors, with six GW of total installed capacity. However, postponing an answer to Russia’s aggression poses a higher risk than the aforementioned threats. Since the military attack on NPP is unprecedented, the world does not have a response ready. The capture of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant (NPP) by the Russian army poses a massive range of threats: radiation accidents, energy deficits, security and economic loss, and industrial espionage. Careers, Fellowships, and Internships Open/Close.Wahba Institute for Strategic Competition.Science and Technology Innovation Program.

Refugee and Forced Displacement Initiative.The Middle East and North Africa Workforce Development Initiative.Kissinger Institute on China and the United States.Nuclear Proliferation International History Project.North Korea International Documentation Project.Environmental Change and Security Program.Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy.IAEA experts "have in recent days and weeks inspected parts of the facility – including some sections of the perimeter of the large cooling pond – and have also conducted regular walks across the site, so far without observing any visible indications of mines or explosives", the IAEA said in a statement. IAEA yet to observe sign of explosivesĮxperts from IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, have yet to observe any indications of mines or explosives at the plant, but they need more access to be sure, the agency said on Wednesday.

Neither Mr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian military, Mr Karchaa or Mr Peskov offered any evidence to the public in support of their allegations. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Wednesday said there was indeed "a great threat of sabotage by the Kyiv regime, which could be catastrophic in its consequences", adding that "all measures are being taken to counter such a threat". "Under cover of darkness overnight on 5th July, the Ukrainian military will try to attack the Zaporizhzhia station using long-range precision equipment and kamikaze attack drones," Russian news agencies quoted Mr Karchaa as saying. "But in any case, the world sees - and cannot fail to see - that the only source of danger to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is Russia. Or they could have some other kind of scenario." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy used his nightly video message later that day to announce Russia was planning to "simulate an attack on the plant. It added the Ukrainian army stood "ready to act under any circumstances". "If detonated, they would not damage the reactors but would create an image of shelling from the Ukrainian side," the statement on Telegram said. The nuclear plant, which was seized by Russian troops, has long been the subject of mutual suspicions between the two warring sides, and any attack on the facility - Europe's largest, with six reactors - could have catastrophic consequences.Ī statement issued by the Ukrainian armed forces on Tuesday quoted "operational data" as saying that "explosive devices" had been placed on the roof of the station's third and fourth reactors earlier that day, and an attack was possible "in the near future".
